Test not_well_formed_adt
Source location: crates/formality-rust/src/prove/test/adt_wf.rs:44
#[test]
fn not_well_formed_adt() {
let assumptions: Wcs = Wcs::t();
let goal: Parameter = term("X<u64>");
prove(
decls(),
Env::default(),
assumptions,
Predicate::WellFormed(goal),
)
.assert_err(expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: u64 = u32, via: Foo(u64), assumptions: {Foo(u64)}, env: Env { variables: [], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_normalize.rs:54:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize_via { goal: u64, via: Foo(u64), assumptions: {Foo(u64)}, env: Env { variables: [], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_normalize.rs:54:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize_via { goal: u32, via: Foo(u64), assumptions: {Foo(u64)}, env: Env { variables: [], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
the rule "trait implied bound" at (prove_wc.rs) failed because
expression evaluated to an empty collection: `decls.trait_invariants()`"#]]);
}
Rules proved (0)
This test records no positive coverage.
Premises failed (11)
The last column links to the premise’s page when the judgment view counts this failure against that premise. It does not when the premise is read as infallible, or when the failure was blamed inside a multi-line premise that carries no record on its own first line.
| Judgment | Rule | Premise | All tests of this premise |
|---|---|---|---|
| prove_after | prove_after | prove(decls, c1.env(), assumptions, goal) => c2 (line 19) | 18 tests |
| prove_eq | symmetric | prove_eq(decls, env, assumptions, r, l) => env_c (line 38) | 15 tests |
| prove_eq | normalize-l | prove_normalize(decls, env, assumptions, x) => C… (line 68) | 15 tests |
| prove_normalize | normalize-via-assumption | prove_normalize_via(decls, env, assumptions, a, … (line 32) | 10 tests |
| prove_wc | assumption | prove_via(decls, env, assumptions, a, goal) => c (line 48) | 21 tests |
| prove_wc | positive impl | prove(decls, env, co_assumptions, Wcs::all_eq(&t… (line 73) | 7 tests |
| prove_wc | trait implied bound | ti in decls.trait_invariants() (line 109) | 14 tests |
| prove_wc | eq | prove_eq(decls, env, assumptions, a, b) => c (line 119) | 15 tests |
| prove_wc | parameter well formed | prove_wf(decls, env, assumptions, p) => c (line 153) | 3 tests |
| prove_wc_list | some | prove_wc(decls, env, assumptions, wc0) => c (line 26) | 42 tests |
| prove_wf | ADT | prove_after(decls, c, assumptions, &t.where_clau… (line 64) | 4 tests |
Proof trees
Failed proof tree
prove failedadt_wf.rs:38args
ruleadt_wf.rs:38prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:8args
rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:26prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:21args
rule "parameter well formed"prove_wc.rs:153prove_wf failedprove_wf.rs:11args
rule "ADT"prove_wf.rs:64prove_after failedprove_after.rs:8args
rule "prove_after"prove_after.rs:19prove failedprove_after.rs:19args
ruleprove_after.rs:19prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:8args
rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:26prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:21args
rule "positive impl"prove_wc.rs:73prove failedprove_wc.rs:73args
ruleprove_wc.rs:73prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:8args
rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:26prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:21args
rule "assumption"prove_wc.rs:48prove_via failedprove_via.rs:8args
rule "eq"prove_wc.rs:119prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:23args
rule "normalize-l"prove_eq.rs:68prove_normalize failedprove_normalize.rs:18args
rule "normalize-via-assumption"prove_normalize.rs:32prove_normalize_via failedprove_normalize.rs:54args
rule "symmetric"prove_eq.rs:38prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:23args
rule "normalize-l"prove_eq.rs:68prove_normalize failedprove_normalize.rs:18args
rule "normalize-via-assumption"prove_normalize.rs:32prove_normalize_via failedprove_normalize.rs:54args
rule "trait implied bound"prove_wc.rs:109 (failed: empty_collection)