Test all_t_not_copy
Source location: crates/formality-rust/src/prove/test/magic_copy.rs:40
#[test]
fn all_t_not_copy() {
test_prove(decls(), term("{} => {for<T> Copy(T)}")).assert_err(
expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !ty_0 = u32, via: Copy(!ty_0), assumptions: {Copy(!ty_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_normalize.rs:54:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize_via { goal: !ty_0, via: Copy(!ty_0), assumptions: {Copy(!ty_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_normalize.rs:54:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize_via { goal: u32, via: Copy(!ty_0), assumptions: {Copy(!ty_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !ty_0 = u32, via: Copy(!ty_0), assumptions: {Copy(!ty_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_normalize.rs:54:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize_via { goal: !ty_0, via: Copy(!ty_0), assumptions: {Copy(!ty_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_normalize.rs:54:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize_via { goal: u32, via: Copy(!ty_0), assumptions: {Copy(!ty_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: Magic(!ty_0), via: Copy(?ty_1), assumptions: {}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0, ?ty_1], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
}
Rules proved (0)
This test records no positive coverage.
Premises failed (12)
The last column links to the premise’s page when the judgment view counts this failure against that premise. It does not when the premise is read as infallible, or when the failure was blamed inside a multi-line premise that carries no record on its own first line.
| Judgment | Rule | Premise | All tests of this premise |
|---|---|---|---|
| prove_after | prove_after | prove(decls, c1.env(), assumptions, goal) => c2 (line 19) | 18 tests |
| prove_eq | symmetric | prove_eq(decls, env, assumptions, r, l) => env_c (line 38) | 15 tests |
| prove_eq | normalize-l | prove_normalize(decls, env, assumptions, x) => C… (line 68) | 15 tests |
| prove_normalize | normalize-via-assumption | prove_normalize_via(decls, env, assumptions, a, … (line 32) | 10 tests |
| prove_wc | forall | prove_wc(decls, env, assumptions, p1) => c (line 35) | 8 tests |
| prove_wc | assumption | prove_via(decls, env, assumptions, a, goal) => c (line 48) | 21 tests |
| prove_wc | positive impl | prove(decls, env, co_assumptions, Wcs::all_eq(&t… (line 73) | 7 tests |
| prove_wc | positive impl | prove_after(decls, c, assumptions, &t.where_clau… (line 80) | 4 tests |
| prove_wc | trait implied bound | prove_via(decls, env, assumptions, &ti.where_cla… (line 112) | 4 tests |
| prove_wc | trait implied bound | prove_after(decls, c, assumptions, &ti.trait_ref… (line 113) | 3 tests |
| prove_wc | eq | prove_eq(decls, env, assumptions, a, b) => c (line 119) | 15 tests |
| prove_wc_list | some | prove_wc(decls, env, assumptions, wc0) => c (line 26) | 42 tests |
Proof trees
Failed proof tree
prove failedtest_util.rs:57args
ruletest_util.rs:57prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:8args
rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:26prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:21args
rule "forall"prove_wc.rs:35prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:21args
rule "positive impl"prove_wc.rs:73prove failedprove_wc.rs:73args
ruleprove_wc.rs:73prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:8args
rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:26prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:21args
rule "assumption"prove_wc.rs:48prove_via failedprove_via.rs:8args
rule "eq"prove_wc.rs:119prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:23args
rule "normalize-l"prove_eq.rs:68prove_normalize failedprove_normalize.rs:18args
rule "normalize-via-assumption"prove_normalize.rs:32prove_normalize_via failedprove_normalize.rs:54args
rule "symmetric"prove_eq.rs:38prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:23args
rule "normalize-l"prove_eq.rs:68prove_normalize failedprove_normalize.rs:18args
rule "normalize-via-assumption"prove_normalize.rs:32prove_normalize_via failedprove_normalize.rs:54args
rule "trait implied bound"prove_wc.rs:113prove_after failedprove_after.rs:8args
rule "prove_after"prove_after.rs:19prove failedprove_after.rs:19args
ruleprove_after.rs:19prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:8args
rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:26prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:21args
rule "positive impl"prove_wc.rs:80prove_after failedprove_after.rs:8args
rule "prove_after"prove_after.rs:19prove failedprove_after.rs:19args
ruleprove_after.rs:19prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:8args
rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:26prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:21args
rule "positive impl"prove_wc.rs:73prove failedprove_wc.rs:73args
ruleprove_wc.rs:73prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:8args
rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:26prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:21args
rule "assumption"prove_wc.rs:48prove_via failedprove_via.rs:8args
rule "eq"prove_wc.rs:119prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:23args
rule "normalize-l"prove_eq.rs:68prove_normalize failedprove_normalize.rs:18args
rule "normalize-via-assumption"prove_normalize.rs:32prove_normalize_via failedprove_normalize.rs:54args
rule "symmetric"prove_eq.rs:38prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:23args
rule "normalize-l"prove_eq.rs:68prove_normalize failedprove_normalize.rs:18args
rule "normalize-via-assumption"prove_normalize.rs:32prove_normalize_via failedprove_normalize.rs:54args
rule "trait implied bound"prove_wc.rs:112prove_via failedprove_via.rs:8args