Test u32_not_u32_impls
Source location: tests/coherence_overlap.rs:129
#[test]
fn u32_not_u32_impls() {
FormalityTest::new(crates![crate core {
trait Foo {}
impl Foo for u32 {}
impl !Foo for u32 {}
}]).err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
failed at (proven_set.rs) because
found an unconditionally true solution Constraints { env: Env { variables: [], bias: Completeness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false }, known_true: true, substitution: {} }"#]])
}
Rules proved (0)
This test records no positive coverage.
Premises failed (4)
The last column links to the premise’s page when the judgment view counts this failure against that premise. It does not when the premise is read as infallible, or when the failure was blamed inside a multi-line premise that carries no record on its own first line.
| Judgment | Rule | Premise | All tests of this premise |
|---|---|---|---|
| check_trait_impl | check_trait_impl | super::prove_not_goal(program, env, where_clause… (line 29) | 2 tests |
| check_all_crates | check all prefixes | for_all(i in 0..crates.len()) (let program = cra… (line 51, blamed at line 53) | not counted by the judgment view |
| check_crate | check crate | for_all(item in &c.items) (check_crate_item(prog… (line 72, blamed at line 73) | not counted by the judgment view |
| check_crate_item | trait impl | check_trait_impl(program, v, crate_id) => () (line 193) | 10 tests |
Proof trees
Failed proof tree
check_all_crates failedmod.rs:41args
rule "check all prefixes"mod.rs:53check_crate failedmod.rs:60args
rule "check crate"mod.rs:73check_crate_item failedmod.rs:178args
rule "trait impl"mod.rs:193check_trait_impl failedimpls.rs:14args
rule "check_trait_impl"impls.rs:29negation_via_failure failednegation.rs:41ruleproven_set.rs:57 (failed: inapplicable)