Test u32_T_where_T_Is_impls
Source location: tests/coherence_overlap.rs:292
#[test]
fn u32_T_where_T_Is_impls() {
FormalityTest::new(crates![crate core {
trait Foo {}
impl Foo for u32 {}
impl<T> Foo for T where T: Is {}
trait Is {}
impl Is for u32 {}
}])
.err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
the rule "different trait" at (coherence.rs) failed because
condition evaluated to false: `impl_a.trait_id() != impl_b.trait_id()`
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: ! Is(!ty_0), via: Is(!ty_0), assumptions: {u32 = !ty_0, Is(!ty_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: ! Is(!ty_0), via: u32 = !ty_0, assumptions: {u32 = !ty_0, Is(!ty_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
the rule "negative impl" at (prove_wc.rs) failed because
expression evaluated to an empty collection: `decls.neg_impl_decls(&trait_ref.trait_id)`
the rule "not goal" at (coherence.rs) failed because
failed to prove {u32 = !ty_1, Is(!ty_1)} given {}, got [Constraints { env: Env { variables: [!ty_1], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false }, known_true: false, substitution: {} }]
the rule "same impl" at (coherence.rs) failed because
condition evaluated to false: `impl_a == impl_b`
impl_a = impl Foo for u32 { }
impl_b = impl <ty> Foo for ^ty0_0 where ^ty0_0 : Is { }"#]])
}
Rules proved (0)
This test records no positive coverage.
Premises failed (10)
The last column links to the premise’s page when the judgment view counts this failure against that premise. It does not when the premise is read as infallible, or when the failure was blamed inside a multi-line premise that carries no record on its own first line.
| Judgment | Rule | Premise | All tests of this premise |
|---|---|---|---|
| check_coherence | check_coherence | for_all(impl_a in current_crate_impls) (for_all(… (line 16, blamed at line 18) | not counted by the judgment view |
| overlap_check_impl | same impl | if impl_a == impl_b (line 72) | 6 tests |
| overlap_check_impl | different trait | if impl_a.trait_id() != impl_b.trait_id() (line 79) | 6 tests |
| overlap_check_impl | not goal | prove_not_goal(program, env, (), (Wcs::all_eq(&a… (line 106) | 6 tests |
| overlap_check_impl | inverted | prove_goal(program, env, (Wcs::all_eq(&a.trait_r… (line 119) | 5 tests |
| check_all_crates | check all prefixes | for_all(i in 0..crates.len()) (let program = cra… (line 51, blamed at line 53) | not counted by the judgment view |
| check_crate | check crate | check_coherence(program, c) => () (line 74) | 12 tests |
| prove_wc | assumption | prove_via(decls, env, assumptions, a, goal) => c (line 48) | 26 tests |
| prove_wc | negative impl | i in decls.neg_impl_decls(&trait_ref.trait_id) (line 93) | 5 tests |
| prove_wc_list | some | prove_wc(decls, env, assumptions, wc0) => c (line 26) | 47 tests |
Proof trees
Failed proof tree
check_all_crates failedmod.rs:41args
rule "check all prefixes"mod.rs:53check_crate failedmod.rs:60args
rule "check crate"mod.rs:74check_coherence failedcoherence.rs:7args
rule "check_coherence"coherence.rs:18overlap_check_impl failedcoherence.rs:64args
rule "different trait"coherence.rs:79 (failed: if_false)rule "inverted"coherence.rs:119prove failedfunction.rs:250args
rulefunction.rs:250prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:8args
rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:26prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:21args
rule "assumption"prove_wc.rs:48prove_via failedprove_via.rs:8args
rule "assumption"prove_wc.rs:48prove_via failedprove_via.rs:8args
rule "negative impl"prove_wc.rs:93 (failed: empty_collection)
rule "not goal"coherence.rs:106 (failed: inapplicable)rule "same impl"coherence.rs:72 (failed: if_false)