Keyboard shortcuts

Press or to navigate between chapters

Press S or / to search in the book

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Test mismatch

Source location: tests/consts.rs:32

#[test]
fn mismatch() {
    FormalityTest::new(crates![crate Foo {
                trait Foo<const C> where type_of_const C is bool {}

                impl Foo<u32(42)> for u32 {}
            }]).err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
                crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_normalize.rs:18:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize { p: u32, assumptions: {}, env: Env { variables: [], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

                crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_normalize.rs:18:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize { p: bool, assumptions: {}, env: Env { variables: [], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

                the rule "trait implied bound" at (prove_wc.rs) failed because
                  expression evaluated to an empty collection: `decls.trait_invariants()`"#]])
}

Rules proved (0)

This test records no positive coverage.

Premises failed (12)

The last column links to the premise’s page when the judgment view counts this failure against that premise. It does not when the premise is read as infallible, or when the failure was blamed inside a multi-line premise that carries no record on its own first line.

JudgmentRulePremiseAll tests of this premise
check_trait_implcheck_trait_implsuper::prove_goal(program, env, where_clauses, P… (line 28)2 tests
check_all_cratescheck all prefixesfor_all(i in 0..crates.len()) (let program = cra… (line 51, blamed at line 53)not counted by the judgment view
check_cratecheck cratefor_all(item in &c.items) (check_crate_item(prog… (line 72, blamed at line 73)not counted by the judgment view
check_crate_itemtrait implcheck_trait_impl(program, v, crate_id) => () (line 193)10 tests
prove_afterprove_afterprove(decls, c1.env(), assumptions, goal) => c2 (line 19)18 tests
prove_eqsymmetricprove_eq(decls, env, assumptions, r, l) => env_c (line 38)15 tests
prove_eqnormalize-lprove_normalize(decls, env, assumptions, x) => C… (line 68)15 tests
prove_wcpositive implprove_after(decls, c, assumptions, &t.where_clau… (line 80)4 tests
prove_wctrait implied boundti in decls.trait_invariants() (line 109)14 tests
prove_wceqprove_eq(decls, env, assumptions, a, b) => c (line 119)15 tests
prove_wcconst has typrove_after(decls, c, assumptions, Predicate::eq… (line 160)1 test
prove_wc_listsomeprove_wc(decls, env, assumptions, wc0) => c (line 26)42 tests

Proof trees

Failed proof tree