Keyboard shortcuts

Press or to navigate between chapters

Press S or / to search in the book

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Test safe_trait_negative_impl_mismatch

Source location: tests/decl_safety.rs:84

#[test]
fn safe_trait_negative_impl_mismatch() {
    FormalityTest::new(crates![crate baguette {
        #![feature(negative_impls)]
        trait Foo {}
        unsafe impl !Foo for u32 {}
    }])
    .rustc_err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
        error[E0198]: negative impls cannot be unsafe
         --> lib.rs
          |
        5 | unsafe impl !Foo for u32 {}
          | ------      -^^^
          | |           |
          | |           negative because of this
          | unsafe because of this

        For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0198`.
        error: could not compile `baguette` (lib) due to 1 previous error
    "#]])
    .err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
        the rule "check_neg_trait_impl" at (impls.rs) failed because
          negative impls cannot be unsafe"#]])
}

Rules proved (0)

This test records no positive coverage.

Premises failed (4)

The last column links to the premise’s page when the judgment view counts this failure against that premise. It does not when the premise is read as infallible, or when the failure was blamed inside a multi-line premise that carries no record on its own first line.

JudgmentRulePremiseAll tests of this premise
check_neg_trait_implcheck_neg_trait_implfail "negative impls cannot be unsafe" (line 55)2 tests
check_all_cratescheck all prefixesfor_all(i in 0..crates.len()) (let program = cra… (line 51, blamed at line 53)not counted by the judgment view
check_cratecheck cratefor_all(item in &c.items) (check_crate_item(prog… (line 72, blamed at line 73)not counted by the judgment view
check_crate_itemneg trait implcheck_neg_trait_impl(program, i) => () (line 212)3 tests

Proof trees

Failed proof tree