Test safe_trait_negative_impl_mismatch
Source location: tests/decl_safety.rs:84
#[test]
fn safe_trait_negative_impl_mismatch() {
FormalityTest::new(crates![crate baguette {
#![feature(negative_impls)]
trait Foo {}
unsafe impl !Foo for u32 {}
}])
.rustc_err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
error[E0198]: negative impls cannot be unsafe
--> lib.rs
|
5 | unsafe impl !Foo for u32 {}
| ------ -^^^
| | |
| | negative because of this
| unsafe because of this
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0198`.
error: could not compile `baguette` (lib) due to 1 previous error
"#]])
.err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
the rule "check_neg_trait_impl" at (impls.rs) failed because
negative impls cannot be unsafe"#]])
}
Rules proved (0)
This test records no positive coverage.
Premises failed (4)
The last column links to the premise’s page when the judgment view counts this failure against that premise. It does not when the premise is read as infallible, or when the failure was blamed inside a multi-line premise that carries no record on its own first line.
| Judgment | Rule | Premise | All tests of this premise |
|---|---|---|---|
| check_neg_trait_impl | check_neg_trait_impl | fail "negative impls cannot be unsafe" (line 55) | 2 tests |
| check_all_crates | check all prefixes | for_all(i in 0..crates.len()) (let program = cra… (line 51, blamed at line 53) | not counted by the judgment view |
| check_crate | check crate | for_all(item in &c.items) (check_crate_item(prog… (line 72, blamed at line 73) | not counted by the judgment view |
| check_crate_item | neg trait impl | check_neg_trait_impl(program, i) => () (line 212) | 3 tests |
Proof trees
Failed proof tree
check_all_crates failedmod.rs:41args
rule "check all prefixes"mod.rs:53check_crate failedmod.rs:60args
rule "check crate"mod.rs:73check_crate_item failedmod.rs:178rule "neg trait impl"mod.rs:212check_neg_trait_impl failedimpls.rs:47rule "check_neg_trait_impl"impls.rs:55 (failed: explicit_failure)