- Feature Name: N/A
- Start Date: 2015-06-26
- RFC PR: rust-lang/rfcs#1184
- Rust Issue: rust-lang/rust#27394
#![no_std] attribute, add a new
#![no_core] attribute, and
pave the way for stabilizing the libcore library.
Currently all stable Rust programs must link to the standard library (libstd), and it is impossible to opt out of this. The standard library is not appropriate for use cases such as kernels, embedded development, or some various niche cases in userspace. For these applications Rust itself is appropriate, but the compiler does not provide a stable interface compiling in this mode.
The standard distribution provides a library, libcore, which is "the essence of Rust" as it provides many language features such as iterators, slice methods, string methods, etc. The defining feature of libcore is that it has 0 dependencies, unlike the standard library which depends on many I/O APIs, for example. The purpose of this RFC is to provide a stable method to access libcore.
Applications which do not want to use libstd still want to use libcore 99% of
the time, but unfortunately the current
#![no_std] attribute does not do a
great job in facilitating this. When moving into the realm of not using the
standard library, the compiler should make the use case as ergonomic as
possible, so this RFC proposes different behavior than today's
Finally, the standard library defines a number of language items which must be defined when libstd is not used. These language items are:
To be able to usefully leverage
#![no_std] in stable Rust these lang items
must be available in a stable fashion.
This RFC proposes a nuber of changes:
- Tweak the
- Introduce a
- Pave the way to stabilize the
#![no_std] attribute currently provides two pieces of functionality:
- The compiler no longer injects
extern crate stdat the top of a crate.
- The prelude (
use std::prelude::v1::*) is no longer injected at the top of every module.
This RFC proposes adding the following behavior to the
- The compiler will inject
extern crate coreat the top of a crate.
- The libcore prelude will be injected at the top of every module.
Most uses of
#![no_std] already want behavior along these lines as they want
to use libcore, just not the standard library.
A new attribute will be added to the compiler,
#![no_core], which serves two
- This attribute implies the
#![no_std]attribute (no std prelude/crate injection).
- This attribute will prevent core prelude/crate injection.
#![no_std] today who do not use libcore would migrate to moving
this attribute instead of
Stabilization of libcore
This RFC does not yet propose a stabilization path for the contents of libcore,
but it proposes readying to stabilize the name
core for libcore, paving the
way for the rest of the library to be stabilized. The exact method of
stabilizing its contents will be determined with a future RFC or pull requests.
Stabilizing lang items
As mentioned above, there are three separate lang items which are required by the libcore library to link correctly. These items are:
This RFC does not attempt to stabilize these lang items for a number of reasons:
- The exact set of these lang items is somewhat nebulous and may change over time.
- The signatures of each of these lang items can either be platform-specific or it's just "too weird" to stabilize.
- These items are pretty obscure and it's not very widely known what they do or how they should be implemented.
Stabilization of these lang items (in any form) will be considered in a future RFC.
The current distribution provides precisely one library, the standard library,
for general consumption of Rust programs. Adding a new one (libcore) is adding
more surface area to the distribution (in addition to adding a new
attribute). This surface area is greatly desired, however.
#![no_std] the experience of Rust programs isn't always the best as
there are some pitfalls that can be run into easily. For example, macros and
plugins sometimes hardcode
::std paths, but most ones in the standard
distribution have been updated to use
::core in the case that
present. Another example is that common utilities like vectors, pointers, and
owned strings are not available without liballoc, which will remain an unstable
library. This means that users of
#![no_std] will have to reimplement all of
this functionality themselves.
This RFC does not yet pave a way forward for using
#![no_std] and producing an
executable because the
#[start] item is required, but remains feature gated.
This RFC just enables creation of Rust static or dynamic libraries which don't
depend on the standard library in addition to Rust libraries (rlibs) which do
not depend on the standard library.
In stabilizing the
#![no_std] attribute it's likely that a whole ecosystem of
crates will arise which work with
#![no_std], but in theory all of these
crates should also interoperate with the rest of the ecosystem using
Unfortunately, however, there are known cases where this is not possible. For
example if a macro is exported from a
#![no_std] crate which references items
core it won't work by default with a
Most of the strategies taken in this RFC have some minor variations on what can happen:
#![no_std]attribute could be stabilized as-is without adding a
#![no_core]attribute, requiring users to write
extern crate coreand import the core prelude manually. The burden of adding
#![no_core]to the compiler, however, is seen as not-too-bad compared to the increase in ergonomics of using
- Another stable crate could be provided by the distribution which provides definitions of these lang items which are all wired to abort. This has the downside of selecting a name for this crate, however, and also inflating the crates in our distribution again.
- How important/common are
#![no_std]executables? Should this RFC attempt to stabilize that as well?
- When a staticlib is emitted should the compiler guarantee that a
#![no_std]one will link by default? This precludes us from ever adding future require language items for features like unwinding or stack exhaustion by default. For example if a new security feature is added to LLVM and we'd like to enable it by default, it may require that a symbol or two is defined somewhere in the compilation.