Negative coverage: borrow_check_expr / call / premise prove_where_clauses(env, assumptions, state, where_clauses) => state
Premise at line 445. Observed failure causes: failed_judgment.
call| Line | Coverage | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 420 | 3 | (borrow_check_expr( env, assumptions, state, callee, args.live_before(env, &state, places_live), ) => (callee_ty, state)) |
| 429 | ✗ | (prove_ty_is_rigid(env, assumptions, state, callee_ty) => (RigidTy { name: RigidName::FnDef(fn_id), parameters }, state)) |
| 432 | ✗ | (let Fn { id: _, safety, binder } = env.crates().fn_named(fn_id)?) |
| 434 | ✗ | (ProvenSet::singleton((safety, ProofTree::leaf("safety"))) => Safety::Safe) |
| 435 | ✗ | (let FnBoundData { input_args, output_ty, where_clauses, body: _ } = binder.instantiate_with(parameters)?) |
| 439 | N/A | (let input_tys: Vec<Ty> = input_args.iter().map(|a| a.ty.clone()).collect()) |
| 440 | 1 | (if input_tys.len() == args.len()) |
| 442 | ✗ | (for_all(i in 0..args.len()) with(state) (borrow_check_expr_has_ty(env, assumptions, state, &args[i], &input_tys[i], places_live) => state)) |
| 445 | 4 | (prove_where_clauses(env, assumptions, state, where_clauses) => state) |
| ──────── ("call") | ||
| 447 | 41 | (borrow_check_expr(env, assumptions, state, Expr::Call { callee, args }, places_live) => (output_ty, state)) |
4 tests failed proving this premise:
Source location: tests/borrowck.rs:4596
#[test]
fn flow_sensitive_invariance_use_it() {
// [nll]: rustc errors
FormalityTest::new(feature_gate_program(
NLL_GATE,
FLOW_SENSITIVE_INVARIANCE_USE_IT,
))
.skip_execute()
.err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !lt_1 : !lt_2, via: @ wf(?lt_0), assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_outlives.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_outlives { a: !lt_1, b: !lt_2, assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
// [polonius]: rustc errors
FormalityTest::new(feature_gate_program(
POLONIUS_ALPHA_GATE,
FLOW_SENSITIVE_INVARIANCE_USE_IT,
))
.skip_execute()
.err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !lt_1 : !lt_2, via: @ wf(?lt_0), assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_outlives.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_outlives { a: !lt_1, b: !lt_2, assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
// [legacy]: rustc passes
FormalityTest::new(feature_gate_program(
POLONIUS_UNLOCKED_GATE,
FLOW_SENSITIVE_INVARIANCE_USE_IT,
))
.skip_execute()
.ok();
}Failed proof tree
check_all_crates failedmod.rs:41args
rule "check all prefixes"mod.rs:53check_crate failedmod.rs:60args
rule "check crate"mod.rs:73check_crate_item failedmod.rs:178rule "free fn"mod.rs:206check_free_fn failedfns.rs:14args
rule "check free fn"fns.rs:24check_fn failedfns.rs:31args
rule "check fn"fns.rs:55check_fn_body failedfns.rs:62args
rule "expr fn body"fns.rs:90borrow_check failednll.rs:127args
rule "borrow_check"nll.rs:138borrow_check_block failednll.rs:145rule "basic block"nll.rs:160borrow_check_statement failednll.rs:177args
rule "exists"nll.rs:330borrow_check_block failednll.rs:145args
rule "basic block"nll.rs:160borrow_check_statement failednll.rs:177args
rule "if"nll.rs:220borrow_check_block failednll.rs:145args
rule "basic block"nll.rs:160borrow_check_statement failednll.rs:177args
rule "return"nll.rs:280borrow_check_expr failednll.rs:372rule "call"nll.rs:445verify_universal_outlives failedoutlives.rs:8args
rule "verify_universal_outlives"outlives.rs:20only_assumed_outlives failedoutlives.rs:27args
rule "universal lifetime"outlives.rs:49can_outlive failedoutlives.rs:56args
rule "universal target"outlives.rs:81prove failedoutlives.rs:81args
ruleoutlives.rs:81prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:8args
rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:26prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:21args
rule "assumption - relation"prove_wc.rs:54prove_via failedprove_via.rs:8args
rule "outlives"prove_wc.rs:152prove_outlives failedprove_outlives.rs:8args
Source location: tests/borrowck.rs:4651
#[test]
fn flow_sensitive_invariance_use_both() {
FormalityTest::new(feature_gate_program(
NLL_GATE,
FLOW_SENSITIVE_INVARIANCE_USE_BOTH,
))
.skip_execute()
.err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !lt_1 : !lt_2, via: @ wf(?lt_0), assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_outlives.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_outlives { a: !lt_1, b: !lt_2, assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
FormalityTest::new(feature_gate_program(
POLONIUS_ALPHA_GATE,
FLOW_SENSITIVE_INVARIANCE_USE_BOTH,
))
.skip_execute()
.err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !lt_1 : !lt_2, via: @ wf(?lt_0), assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_outlives.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_outlives { a: !lt_1, b: !lt_2, assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
FormalityTest::new(feature_gate_program(
POLONIUS_UNLOCKED_GATE,
FLOW_SENSITIVE_INVARIANCE_USE_BOTH,
))
.skip_execute()
.err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !lt_1 : !lt_2, via: @ wf(?lt_0), assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_outlives.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_outlives { a: !lt_1, b: !lt_2, assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
}Failed proof tree
check_all_crates failedmod.rs:41args
rule "check all prefixes"mod.rs:53check_crate failedmod.rs:60args
rule "check crate"mod.rs:73check_crate_item failedmod.rs:178rule "free fn"mod.rs:206check_free_fn failedfns.rs:14args
rule "check free fn"fns.rs:24check_fn failedfns.rs:31args
rule "check fn"fns.rs:55check_fn_body failedfns.rs:62args
rule "expr fn body"fns.rs:90borrow_check failednll.rs:127args
rule "borrow_check"nll.rs:138borrow_check_block failednll.rs:145rule "basic block"nll.rs:160borrow_check_statement failednll.rs:177args
rule "exists"nll.rs:327borrow_check_block failednll.rs:145args
rule "basic block"nll.rs:160borrow_check_statement failednll.rs:177args
rule "expr"nll.rs:230borrow_check_expr failednll.rs:372args
rule "call"nll.rs:445verify_universal_outlives failedoutlives.rs:8args
rule "verify_universal_outlives"outlives.rs:20only_assumed_outlives failedoutlives.rs:27args
rule "universal lifetime"outlives.rs:49can_outlive failedoutlives.rs:56args
rule "universal target"outlives.rs:81prove failedoutlives.rs:81args
ruleoutlives.rs:81prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:8args
rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:26prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:21args
rule "assumption - relation"prove_wc.rs:54prove_via failedprove_via.rs:8args
rule "outlives"prove_wc.rs:152prove_outlives failedprove_outlives.rs:8args
Source location: tests/borrowck.rs:4661
#[test]
fn flow_sensitive_invariance_use_both() {
FormalityTest::new(feature_gate_program(
NLL_GATE,
FLOW_SENSITIVE_INVARIANCE_USE_BOTH,
))
.skip_execute()
.err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !lt_1 : !lt_2, via: @ wf(?lt_0), assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_outlives.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_outlives { a: !lt_1, b: !lt_2, assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
FormalityTest::new(feature_gate_program(
POLONIUS_ALPHA_GATE,
FLOW_SENSITIVE_INVARIANCE_USE_BOTH,
))
.skip_execute()
.err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !lt_1 : !lt_2, via: @ wf(?lt_0), assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_outlives.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_outlives { a: !lt_1, b: !lt_2, assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
FormalityTest::new(feature_gate_program(
POLONIUS_UNLOCKED_GATE,
FLOW_SENSITIVE_INVARIANCE_USE_BOTH,
))
.skip_execute()
.err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !lt_1 : !lt_2, via: @ wf(?lt_0), assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_outlives.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_outlives { a: !lt_1, b: !lt_2, assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
}Failed proof tree
check_all_crates failedmod.rs:41args
rule "check all prefixes"mod.rs:53check_crate failedmod.rs:60args
rule "check crate"mod.rs:73check_crate_item failedmod.rs:178rule "free fn"mod.rs:206check_free_fn failedfns.rs:14args
rule "check free fn"fns.rs:24check_fn failedfns.rs:31args
rule "check fn"fns.rs:55check_fn_body failedfns.rs:62args
rule "expr fn body"fns.rs:90borrow_check failednll.rs:127args
rule "borrow_check"nll.rs:138borrow_check_block failednll.rs:145rule "basic block"nll.rs:160borrow_check_statement failednll.rs:177args
rule "exists"nll.rs:311borrow_check_block failednll.rs:145args
rule "basic block"nll.rs:160borrow_check_statement failednll.rs:177args
rule "expr"nll.rs:230borrow_check_expr failednll.rs:372args
rule "call"nll.rs:445verify_universal_outlives failedoutlives.rs:8args
rule "verify_universal_outlives"outlives.rs:20only_assumed_outlives failedoutlives.rs:27args
rule "universal lifetime"outlives.rs:49can_outlive failedoutlives.rs:56args
rule "universal target"outlives.rs:81prove failedoutlives.rs:81args
ruleoutlives.rs:81prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:8args
rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:26prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:21args
rule "assumption - relation"prove_wc.rs:54prove_via failedprove_via.rs:8args
rule "outlives"prove_wc.rs:152prove_outlives failedprove_outlives.rs:8args
Source location: tests/borrowck.rs:4671
#[test]
fn flow_sensitive_invariance_use_both() {
FormalityTest::new(feature_gate_program(
NLL_GATE,
FLOW_SENSITIVE_INVARIANCE_USE_BOTH,
))
.skip_execute()
.err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !lt_1 : !lt_2, via: @ wf(?lt_0), assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_outlives.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_outlives { a: !lt_1, b: !lt_2, assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
FormalityTest::new(feature_gate_program(
POLONIUS_ALPHA_GATE,
FLOW_SENSITIVE_INVARIANCE_USE_BOTH,
))
.skip_execute()
.err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !lt_1 : !lt_2, via: @ wf(?lt_0), assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_outlives.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_outlives { a: !lt_1, b: !lt_2, assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
FormalityTest::new(feature_gate_program(
POLONIUS_UNLOCKED_GATE,
FLOW_SENSITIVE_INVARIANCE_USE_BOTH,
))
.skip_execute()
.err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !lt_1 : !lt_2, via: @ wf(?lt_0), assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_outlives.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_outlives { a: !lt_1, b: !lt_2, assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
}Failed proof tree
check_all_crates failedmod.rs:41args
rule "check all prefixes"mod.rs:53check_crate failedmod.rs:60args
rule "check crate"mod.rs:73check_crate_item failedmod.rs:178rule "free fn"mod.rs:206check_free_fn failedfns.rs:14args
rule "check free fn"fns.rs:24check_fn failedfns.rs:31args
rule "check fn"fns.rs:55check_fn_body failedfns.rs:62args
rule "expr fn body"fns.rs:90borrow_check failednll.rs:127args
rule "borrow_check"nll.rs:138borrow_check_block failednll.rs:145rule "basic block"nll.rs:160borrow_check_statement failednll.rs:177args
rule "exists"nll.rs:300borrow_check_block failednll.rs:145args
rule "basic block"nll.rs:160borrow_check_statement failednll.rs:177args
rule "expr"nll.rs:230borrow_check_expr failednll.rs:372args
rule "call"nll.rs:445verify_universal_outlives failedoutlives.rs:8args
rule "verify_universal_outlives"outlives.rs:20only_assumed_outlives failedoutlives.rs:27args
rule "universal lifetime"outlives.rs:49can_outlive failedoutlives.rs:56args
rule "universal target"outlives.rs:81prove failedoutlives.rs:81args
ruleoutlives.rs:81prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:8args
rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:26prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:21args
rule "assumption - relation"prove_wc.rs:54prove_via failedprove_via.rs:8args
rule "outlives"prove_wc.rs:152prove_outlives failedprove_outlives.rs:8args