Negative coverage: borrow_check_statement / exists / premise borrow_check_block(env, assumptions_body, state, block, places_live_on_exit) => state
Premise at line 300. Observed failure causes: failed_judgment.
exists| Line | Coverage | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 296 | ✗ | (if feature_gate_enabled_in_program(&env.program, &FeatureGateName::PoloniusUnlocked)) |
| 298 | N/A | (let (env, subst, block) = env.instantiate_existentially(binder)) |
| 299 | N/A | (let assumptions_body = (assumptions, wf_assumptions_for_existential_subst(&subst))) |
| 300 | 1 | (borrow_check_block(env, assumptions_body, state, block, places_live_on_exit) => state) |
| 301 | N/A | (let state = state.pop_subst(&env.env, subst)) |
| ──────── ("exists") | ||
| 303 | 54 | (borrow_check_statement(env, assumptions, state, Stmt::Exists { binder }, places_live_on_exit) => (env, state)) |
1 test failed proving this premise:
Source location: tests/borrowck.rs:4671
#[test]
fn flow_sensitive_invariance_use_both() {
FormalityTest::new(feature_gate_program(
NLL_GATE,
FLOW_SENSITIVE_INVARIANCE_USE_BOTH,
))
.skip_execute()
.err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !lt_1 : !lt_2, via: @ wf(?lt_0), assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_outlives.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_outlives { a: !lt_1, b: !lt_2, assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
FormalityTest::new(feature_gate_program(
POLONIUS_ALPHA_GATE,
FLOW_SENSITIVE_INVARIANCE_USE_BOTH,
))
.skip_execute()
.err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !lt_1 : !lt_2, via: @ wf(?lt_0), assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_outlives.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_outlives { a: !lt_1, b: !lt_2, assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
FormalityTest::new(feature_gate_program(
POLONIUS_UNLOCKED_GATE,
FLOW_SENSITIVE_INVARIANCE_USE_BOTH,
))
.skip_execute()
.err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_via.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !lt_1 : !lt_2, via: @ wf(?lt_0), assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove_outlives.rs:8:1: no applicable rules for prove_outlives { a: !lt_1, b: !lt_2, assumptions: {@ wf(?lt_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!lt_1, !lt_2, ?lt_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
}
Failed proof tree
check_all_crates failedmod.rs:41args
rule "check all prefixes"mod.rs:53check_crate failedmod.rs:60args
rule "check crate"mod.rs:73check_crate_item failedmod.rs:178rule "free fn"mod.rs:206check_free_fn failedfns.rs:14args
rule "check free fn"fns.rs:24check_fn failedfns.rs:31args
rule "check fn"fns.rs:55check_fn_body failedfns.rs:62args
rule "expr fn body"fns.rs:90borrow_check failednll.rs:127args
rule "borrow_check"nll.rs:138borrow_check_block failednll.rs:145rule "basic block"nll.rs:160borrow_check_statement failednll.rs:177args
rule "exists"nll.rs:300borrow_check_block failednll.rs:145args
rule "basic block"nll.rs:160borrow_check_statement failednll.rs:177args
rule "expr"nll.rs:230borrow_check_expr failednll.rs:372args
rule "call"nll.rs:445verify_universal_outlives failedoutlives.rs:8args
rule "verify_universal_outlives"outlives.rs:20only_assumed_outlives failedoutlives.rs:27args
rule "universal lifetime"outlives.rs:49can_outlive failedoutlives.rs:56args
rule "universal target"outlives.rs:81prove failedoutlives.rs:81args
ruleoutlives.rs:81prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:8args
rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:26prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:21args
rule "assumption - relation"prove_wc.rs:54prove_via failedprove_via.rs:8args
rule "outlives"prove_wc.rs:152prove_outlives failedprove_outlives.rs:8args