Positive coverage: prove_normalize_via / axiom-l
axiom-l| Line | Coverage | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 94 | ✗ | (if let None = goal.downcast::<ExistentialVar>()) |
| 95 | ✗ | (if goal != b) |
| 96 | 1 | (prove_syntactically_eq(decls, env, assumptions, a, goal) => c) |
| 97 | N/A | (let b = c.substitution().apply(b)) |
| ──────── ("axiom-l") | ||
| 99 | 3 | (prove_normalize_via(decls, env, assumptions, Relation::Equals(a, b), goal) => Constrained(b, c)) |
3 tests exercised this rule:
Source location: crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/test/eq_assumptions.rs:15
#[test]
fn test_a() {
test_prove(
Program::empty(),
term("{} => {for<T, U> if {T = u32, U = Vec<T>} U = Vec<u32>}"),
)
.assert_ok(expect!["{Constraints { env: Env { variables: [], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false }, known_true: true, substitution: {} }}"]);
}
Proof tree
prove_wc_list (some)prove_wc_list.rs:31prove_wc (forall)prove_wc.rs:38prove_wc (implies)prove_wc.rs:44prove_wc (eq)prove_wc.rs:128prove_eq (normalize-l)prove_eq.rs:72prove_normalize (normalize-via-assumption)prove_normalize.rs:34prove_normalize_via (axiom-l)prove_normalize.rs:98
prove_after (prove_after)prove_after.rs:20prove_wc_list (some)prove_wc_list.rs:31prove_wc (eq)prove_wc.rs:128prove_eq (rigid)prove_eq.rs:50prove_wc_list (some)prove_wc_list.rs:31prove_wc (assumption - relation)prove_wc.rs:57prove_via (relation-axiom)prove_via.rs:41
prove_after (prove_after)prove_after.rs:20prove_wc_list (none)prove_wc_list.rs:24
prove_after (prove_after)prove_after.rs:20prove_wc_list (none)prove_wc_list.rs:24
prove_after (prove_after)prove_after.rs:20prove_wc_list (none)prove_wc_list.rs:24
Source location: crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/test/eq_assumptions.rs:24
#[test]
fn test_b() {
test_prove(
Program::empty(),
term("exists<A> {} => {for<T, U> if {T = u32, U = Vec<T>} A = U}"),
)
.assert_ok(expect!["{Constraints { env: Env { variables: [?ty_2, ?ty_1], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false }, known_true: true, substitution: {?ty_1 => Vec<u32>, ?ty_2 => u32} }}"]);
}
Proof tree
prove_wc_list (some)prove_wc_list.rs:31prove_wc (forall)prove_wc.rs:38prove_wc (implies)prove_wc.rs:44prove_wc (eq)prove_wc.rs:128prove_eq (symmetric)prove_eq.rs:41prove_eq (normalize-l)prove_eq.rs:72prove_normalize (normalize-via-assumption)prove_normalize.rs:34prove_normalize_via (axiom-l)prove_normalize.rs:98
prove_after (prove_after)prove_after.rs:20prove_wc_list (some)prove_wc_list.rs:31prove_wc (eq)prove_wc.rs:128prove_eq (symmetric)prove_eq.rs:41prove_eq (existential)prove_eq.rs:65prove_existential_var_eq (existential-nonvar)prove_eq.rs:98prove_after (prove_after)prove_after.rs:20prove_wc_list (some)prove_wc_list.rs:31prove_wc (eq)prove_wc.rs:128prove_eq (normalize-l)prove_eq.rs:72prove_normalize (normalize-via-assumption)prove_normalize.rs:34prove_normalize_via (axiom-l)prove_normalize.rs:98
prove_after (prove_after)prove_after.rs:20prove_wc_list (some)prove_wc_list.rs:31prove_wc (eq)prove_wc.rs:128prove_eq (symmetric)prove_eq.rs:41prove_eq (existential)prove_eq.rs:65prove_existential_var_eq (existential-nonvar)prove_eq.rs:98prove_after (prove_after)prove_after.rs:20prove_wc_list (none)prove_wc_list.rs:24
prove_after (prove_after)prove_after.rs:20prove_wc_list (none)prove_wc_list.rs:24
prove_after (prove_after)prove_after.rs:20prove_wc_list (none)prove_wc_list.rs:24
prove_after (prove_after)prove_after.rs:20prove_wc_list (none)prove_wc_list.rs:24
prove_after (prove_after)prove_after.rs:20prove_wc_list (none)prove_wc_list.rs:24
Source location: crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/test/eq_assumptions.rs:126
#[test]
fn test_normalize_assoc_ty_existential1() {
test_prove(
Program::empty(),
term(
"\
forall<T> \
exists<A> \
{ <T as Iterator>::Item = u32 } => { <A as Iterator>::Item = u32 }",
),
)
.assert_ok(expect!["{Constraints { env: Env { variables: [!ty_1, ?ty_2], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false }, known_true: true, substitution: {?ty_2 => !ty_1} }}"]);
}
Proof tree
prove_wc_list (some)prove_wc_list.rs:31prove_wc (eq)prove_wc.rs:128prove_eq (normalize-l)prove_eq.rs:72prove_normalize (normalize-via-assumption)prove_normalize.rs:34prove_normalize_via (axiom-l)prove_normalize.rs:98prove_syntactically_eq (alias)prove_normalize.rs:165zipcombinators.rs:38prove_syntactically_eq (symmetric)prove_normalize.rs:147prove_syntactically_eq (existential-nonvar)prove_normalize.rs:171prove_existential_var_eq (existential-universal)prove_eq.rs:143
prove_after (prove_after)prove_after.rs:20prove_wc_list (some)prove_wc_list.rs:31prove_wc (eq)prove_wc.rs:128prove_after (prove_after)prove_after.rs:20prove_wc_list (none)prove_wc_list.rs:24
prove_after (prove_after)prove_after.rs:20prove_wc_list (none)prove_wc_list.rs:24