Negative coverage: prove_via / forall / premise prove_via(decls, env, assumptions, via1, goal) => c
Premise at line 50. Observed failure causes: failed_judgment.
forall| Line | Coverage | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 47 | N/A | (let (env, subst) = env.existential_substitution(binder)) |
| 48 | N/A | (let via1 = binder.instantiate_with(&subst).unwrap()) |
| 50 | 1 | (prove_via(decls, env, assumptions, via1, goal) => c) |
| ──────── ("forall") | ||
| 52 | 2 | (prove_via(decls, env, assumptions, WcData::ForAll(binder), goal) => c.pop_subst(&subst)) |
1 test failed proving this premise:
Source location: tests/basic_tests.rs:85
#[test]
fn basic_where_clauses_fail() {
FormalityTest::new(crates![crate core {
#![feature(non_lifetime_binders)]
trait A<T> where T: B { }
trait B { }
trait WellFormed where for<T> u32: A<T> { }
}]).err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: @ WellFormedTraitRef(A(u32, !ty_1)), via: A(u32, ?ty_2), assumptions: {for <ty> A(u32, ^ty0_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_1, ?ty_2], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: B(!ty_0), via: A(u32, ?ty_1), assumptions: {for <ty> A(u32, ^ty0_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0, ?ty_1], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
the rule "trait implied bound" at (prove_wc.rs) failed because
expression evaluated to an empty collection: `decls.trait_invariants()`"#]])
}
Failed proof tree
check_all_crates failedmod.rs:41rule "check all prefixes"mod.rs:53check_crate failedmod.rs:60rule "check crate"mod.rs:73check_crate_item failedmod.rs:163rule "trait"mod.rs:172check_trait failedtraits.rs:9rule "check trait"traits.rs:23prove failedfunction.rs:250rulefunction.rs:250prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:11rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:29prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "forall"prove_wc.rs:37prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "assumption - predicate"prove_wc.rs:50prove_via failedprove_via.rs:9rule "forall"prove_via.rs:50prove_via failedprove_via.rs:9
rule "trait well formed"prove_wc.rs:142prove_after failedprove_after.rs:8rule "prove_after"prove_after.rs:19prove failedprove_after.rs:19ruleprove_after.rs:19prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:11rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:29prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "assumption - predicate"prove_wc.rs:50prove_via failedprove_via.rs:9rule "forall"prove_via.rs:50prove_via failedprove_via.rs:9