Negative coverage: prove_wc / assumption - predicate / premise prove_via(decls, env, assumptions, a, goal) => c

Premise at line 50. Observed failure causes: failed_judgment.

10 tests failed proving this premise:

Source location: crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/test/eq_partial_eq.rs:33

#[test]
fn not_partial_eq_implies_eq() {
    let goal: Wc = term("for<T> if {PartialEq(T)} Eq(T)");
    prove(decls(), (), (), goal)
    .assert_err(
    expect![[r#"
        crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: Eq(!ty_1), via: PartialEq(!ty_1), assumptions: {PartialEq(!ty_1)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_1], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

        crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: Eq(!ty_1), via: PartialEq(?ty_2), assumptions: {PartialEq(!ty_1)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_1, ?ty_2], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
}

Source location: crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/test/eq_partial_eq.rs:44

#[test]
fn universals_not_eq() {
    let goal: Wc = term("for<T, U> if {Eq(T)} PartialEq(U)");
    prove(decls(), (), (), goal)
    .assert_err(
    expect![[r#"
        crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: PartialEq(!ty_2), via: Eq(!ty_1), assumptions: {Eq(!ty_1)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_1, !ty_2], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

        crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !ty_0 = !ty_1, via: Eq(!ty_0), assumptions: {Eq(!ty_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0, !ty_1], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

        crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_normalize.rs:55:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize_via { goal: !ty_0, via: Eq(!ty_0), assumptions: {Eq(!ty_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0, !ty_1], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

        crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_normalize.rs:55:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize_via { goal: !ty_1, via: Eq(!ty_0), assumptions: {Eq(!ty_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0, !ty_1], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

        crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: Eq(!ty_1), via: PartialEq(?ty_2), assumptions: {Eq(!ty_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0, !ty_1, ?ty_2], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
}

Source location: tests/basic_tests.rs:34

#[test]
fn hello_world_fail() {
    FormalityTest::new(crates![crate Foo {
                trait Foo<T> where T: Bar<Self> {}

                trait Bar<T> where T: Baz {}

                trait Baz {}
            }]).err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
                crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: @ WellFormedTraitRef(Bar(!ty_0, !ty_1)), via: Bar(!ty_0, !ty_1), assumptions: {Bar(!ty_0, !ty_1)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_1, !ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

                crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: Baz(!ty_1), via: Bar(!ty_0, !ty_1), assumptions: {Bar(!ty_0, !ty_1)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_1, !ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

                the rule "trait implied bound" at (prove_wc.rs) failed because
                  expression evaluated to an empty collection: `decls.trait_invariants()`"#]])
}

Source location: tests/basic_tests.rs:85

#[test]
fn basic_where_clauses_fail() {
    FormalityTest::new(crates![crate core {
                #![feature(non_lifetime_binders)]
                trait A<T> where T: B { }

                trait B { }

                trait WellFormed where for<T> u32: A<T> { }
            }]).err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
            crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: @ WellFormedTraitRef(A(u32, !ty_1)), via: A(u32, ?ty_2), assumptions: {for <ty> A(u32, ^ty0_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_1, ?ty_2], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

            crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: B(!ty_0), via: A(u32, ?ty_1), assumptions: {for <ty> A(u32, ^ty0_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0, ?ty_1], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

            the rule "trait implied bound" at (prove_wc.rs) failed because
              expression evaluated to an empty collection: `decls.trait_invariants()`"#]])
}

Source location: tests/borrowck.rs:453

fn foo() -> Datum {
    exists<'r0, 'r1> {
        let x: Datum = Datum { value: 0 _ u32 };
        let r: &'r0 Datum = &'r1 x;
        let y: Datum = *r;
        return y;
    }
}

Source location: tests/borrowck.rs:1112

fn foo() -> Datum {
    exists<'r0, 'r1> {
        let x: Datum = Datum { value: 0 _ u32 };
        let r: &mut 'r0 Datum = &mut 'r1 x;
        let y: Datum = *r;
        return y;
    }
}

Source location: tests/consts.rs:68

#[test]
fn generic_mismatch() {
    FormalityTest::new(crates![crate Foo {
                trait Foo<const C> where type_of_const C is bool {}

                // Here, the impl is assuming C is u32, which mismatches the trait bound.
                impl<const C> Foo<C> for u32 where type_of_const C is u32 {}
            }]).err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
                crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: Foo(u32, !const_0), via: @ ConstHasType(!const_0 , u32), assumptions: {@ ConstHasType(!const_0 , u32)}, env: Env { variables: [!const_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

                crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: u32 = bool, via: @ ConstHasType(!const_0 , u32), assumptions: {@ ConstHasType(!const_0 , u32)}, env: Env { variables: [!const_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

                crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_normalize.rs:55:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize_via { goal: u32, via: @ ConstHasType(!const_0 , u32), assumptions: {@ ConstHasType(!const_0 , u32)}, env: Env { variables: [!const_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

                crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_normalize.rs:55:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize_via { goal: bool, via: @ ConstHasType(!const_0 , u32), assumptions: {@ ConstHasType(!const_0 , u32)}, env: Env { variables: [!const_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

                crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_const_has_type.rs:11:1: no applicable rules for prove_const_has_type { constant: !const_0, assumptions: {@ ConstHasType(!const_0 , u32)}, env: Env { variables: [!const_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false }, decls: program([crate core { trait Copy <ty> { } impl Copy for () { } impl Copy for u8 { } impl Copy for u16 { } impl Copy for u32 { } impl Copy for u64 { } impl Copy for i8 { } impl Copy for i16 { } impl Copy for i32 { } impl Copy for i64 { } impl Copy for bool { } impl Copy for usize { } impl Copy for isize { } impl <lt, ty> Copy for &^lt0_0 ^ty0_1 { } trait Drop <ty> { } trait Derefable <ty> { type Target : [] ; } impl <lt, ty> Derefable for &^lt0_0 ^ty0_1 where ^ty0_1 : ^lt0_0 { type Target = ^ty1_1 ; } impl <lt, ty> Derefable for &mut ^lt0_0 ^ty0_1 where ^ty0_1 : ^lt0_0 { type Target = ^ty1_1 ; } }, crate Foo { trait Foo <ty, const> where type_of_const ^const0_1 is bool { } impl <const> Foo <^const0_0> for u32 where type_of_const ^const0_0 is u32 { } }], 222) }

                the rule "trait implied bound" at (prove_wc.rs) failed because
                  expression evaluated to an empty collection: `decls.trait_invariants()`"#]])
}

Source location: tests/drop.rs:99

#[test]
fn drop_impl_extra_where_clause() {
    FormalityTest::new(crates![
        crate Foo {
            trait Clone {}

            struct MyStruct<T> {
                value: T,
            }

            impl<T> Drop for MyStruct<T> where T: Clone {}
        }
    ])
    .err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
        crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: Clone(!ty_0), via: Drop(MyStruct<!ty_0>), assumptions: {Drop(MyStruct<!ty_0>)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

        the rule "trait implied bound" at (prove_wc.rs) failed because
          expression evaluated to an empty collection: `decls.trait_invariants()`

        the rule "trait implied bound" at (prove_wc.rs) failed because
          expression evaluated to an empty collection: `decls.trait_invariants()`"#]])
}

Source location: tests/references.rs:13

Source location: tests/well_formed_trait_ref.rs:37

#[test]
fn missing_dependent_where_clause() {
    FormalityTest::new(crates![crate foo {
        trait Trait1 {}

        trait Trait2 {}

        struct S1<T> where T: Trait1 {
            dummy: T,
        }

        struct S2<T> where S1<T> : Trait2 {
            dummy: T,
        }
    }])
    .err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
        crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: @ WellFormedTraitRef(Trait2(S1<!ty_0>)), via: Trait2(S1<!ty_0>), assumptions: {Trait2(S1<!ty_0>)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

        crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: Trait1(!ty_0), via: Trait2(S1<!ty_0>), assumptions: {Trait2(S1<!ty_0>)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }

        the rule "trait implied bound" at (prove_wc.rs) failed because
          expression evaluated to an empty collection: `decls.trait_invariants()`"#]])
}