Negative coverage: prove_wc / const has ty / premise prove_after(decls, c, assumptions, Relation::equals(ty_constant, ty)) => c
Premise at line 168. Observed failure causes: failed_judgment.
const has ty| Line | Coverage | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 167 | 1 | (prove_const_has_type(decls, env, assumptions, constant) => (ty_constant, c)) |
| 168 | 1 | (prove_after(decls, c, assumptions, Relation::equals(ty_constant, ty)) => c) |
| ──────── ("const has ty") | ||
| 170 | 3 | (prove_wc(decls, env, assumptions, Predicate::ConstHasType(constant, ty)) => c) |
1 test failed proving this premise:
Source location: tests/consts.rs:32
#[test]
fn mismatch() {
FormalityTest::new(crates![crate Foo {
trait Foo<const C> where type_of_const C is bool {}
impl Foo<u32(42)> for u32 {}
}]).err(expect_test::expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_normalize.rs:19:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize { p: u32, assumptions: {}, env: Env { variables: [], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_normalize.rs:19:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize { p: bool, assumptions: {}, env: Env { variables: [], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
the rule "trait implied bound" at (prove_wc.rs) failed because
expression evaluated to an empty collection: `decls.trait_invariants()`"#]])
}Failed proof tree
check_all_crates failedmod.rs:41rule "check all prefixes"mod.rs:53check_crate failedmod.rs:60rule "check crate"mod.rs:73check_crate_item failedmod.rs:163rule "trait impl"mod.rs:178check_trait_impl failedimpls.rs:13rule "check_trait_impl"impls.rs:27prove failedfunction.rs:250rulefunction.rs:250prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:11rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:29prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "positive impl"prove_wc.rs:88prove_after failedprove_after.rs:8rule "prove_after"prove_after.rs:19prove failedprove_after.rs:19ruleprove_after.rs:19prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:11rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:29prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "const has ty"prove_wc.rs:168prove_after failedprove_after.rs:8rule "prove_after"prove_after.rs:19prove failedprove_after.rs:19ruleprove_after.rs:19prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:11rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:29prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "eq"prove_wc.rs:127prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:25rule "normalize-l"prove_eq.rs:70prove_normalize failedprove_normalize.rs:19
rule "symmetric"prove_eq.rs:40prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:25rule "normalize-l"prove_eq.rs:70prove_normalize failedprove_normalize.rs:19