Negative coverage: prove_wc / implies / premise prove_wc(decls, env, (assumptions, p1), p2) => c
Premise at line 43. Observed failure causes: failed_judgment.
implies| Line | Coverage | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 43 | 3 | (prove_wc(decls, env, (assumptions, p1), p2) => c) |
| ──────── ("implies") | ||
| 45 | 4 | (prove_wc(decls, env, assumptions, WcData::Implies(p1, p2)) => c) |
3 tests failed proving this premise:
Source location: crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/test/eq_assumptions.rs:41
#[test]
fn test_normalize_assoc_ty_existential0() {
test_prove(
Program::empty(),
term("exists<A> {} => {for<T> if { <T as Iterator>::Item = u32 } <A as Iterator>::Item = u32}"),
).assert_err(
expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: <?ty_0 as Iterator>::Item = u32, via: <!ty_1 as Iterator>::Item = u32, assumptions: {<!ty_1 as Iterator>::Item = u32}, env: Env { variables: [?ty_0, !ty_1], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
the rule "existential-nonvar" at (prove_eq.rs) failed because
pattern `None` did not match value `Some(!ty_1)`
the rule "existential-universal" at (prove_eq.rs) failed because
condition evaluated to false: `env.universe(p) < env.universe(v)`
the rule "existential-nonvar" at (prove_eq.rs) failed because
pattern `None` did not match value `Some(!ty_1)`
the rule "existential-universal" at (prove_eq.rs) failed because
condition evaluated to false: `env.universe(p) < env.universe(v)`
the rule "normalize-via-impl" at (prove_normalize.rs) failed because
expression evaluated to an empty collection: `decls.alias_eq_decls(&a.name)`
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: <!ty_0 as Iterator>::Item = <?ty_1 as Iterator>::Item, via: <!ty_0 as Iterator>::Item = u32, assumptions: {<!ty_0 as Iterator>::Item = u32}, env: Env { variables: [?ty_1, !ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !ty_0 = ?ty_1, via: <!ty_0 as Iterator>::Item = u32, assumptions: {<!ty_0 as Iterator>::Item = u32}, env: Env { variables: [?ty_1, !ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
the rule "existential-nonvar" at (prove_eq.rs) failed because
pattern `None` did not match value `Some(!ty_0)`
the rule "existential-universal" at (prove_eq.rs) failed because
condition evaluated to false: `env.universe(p) < env.universe(v)`
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_normalize.rs:55:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize_via { goal: ?ty_1, via: <!ty_0 as Iterator>::Item = u32, assumptions: {<!ty_0 as Iterator>::Item = u32}, env: Env { variables: [?ty_1, !ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: u32 = <?ty_1 as Iterator>::Item, via: <!ty_0 as Iterator>::Item = u32, assumptions: {<!ty_0 as Iterator>::Item = u32}, env: Env { variables: [?ty_1, !ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
the rule "existential-nonvar" at (prove_eq.rs) failed because
pattern `None` did not match value `Some(!ty_0)`
the rule "existential-universal" at (prove_eq.rs) failed because
condition evaluated to false: `env.universe(p) < env.universe(v)`
the rule "existential-nonvar" at (prove_eq.rs) failed because
pattern `None` did not match value `Some(!ty_0)`
the rule "existential-universal" at (prove_eq.rs) failed because
condition evaluated to false: `env.universe(p) < env.universe(v)`
the rule "normalize-via-impl" at (prove_normalize.rs) failed because
expression evaluated to an empty collection: `decls.alias_eq_decls(&a.name)`
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: ?ty_1 = !ty_0, via: <!ty_0 as Iterator>::Item = u32, assumptions: {<!ty_0 as Iterator>::Item = u32}, env: Env { variables: [?ty_1, !ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
the rule "existential-nonvar" at (prove_eq.rs) failed because
pattern `None` did not match value `Some(!ty_0)`
the rule "existential-universal" at (prove_eq.rs) failed because
condition evaluated to false: `env.universe(p) < env.universe(v)`
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_normalize.rs:55:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize_via { goal: ?ty_1, via: <!ty_0 as Iterator>::Item = u32, assumptions: {<!ty_0 as Iterator>::Item = u32}, env: Env { variables: [?ty_1, !ty_0], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
the rule "existential-nonvar" at (prove_eq.rs) failed because
pattern `None` did not match value `Some(!ty_0)`
the rule "existential-universal" at (prove_eq.rs) failed because
condition evaluated to false: `env.universe(p) < env.universe(v)`
the rule "existential-nonvar" at (prove_eq.rs) failed because
pattern `None` did not match value `Some(!ty_0)`
the rule "existential-universal" at (prove_eq.rs) failed because
condition evaluated to false: `env.universe(p) < env.universe(v)`
the rule "normalize-via-impl" at (prove_normalize.rs) failed because
expression evaluated to an empty collection: `decls.alias_eq_decls(&a.name)`"#]]);
}
Failed proof tree
prove failedtest_util.rs:60ruletest_util.rs:60prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:11rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:29prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "forall"prove_wc.rs:37prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "implies"prove_wc.rs:43prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "assumption - relation"prove_wc.rs:56prove_via failedprove_via.rs:9
rule "eq"prove_wc.rs:127prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:25rule "normalize-l"prove_eq.rs:70prove_normalize failedprove_normalize.rs:19rule "normalize-via-assumption"prove_normalize.rs:33prove_normalize_via failedprove_normalize.rs:55rule "axiom-l"prove_normalize.rs:96prove_syntactically_eq failedprove_normalize.rs:133rule "alias"prove_normalize.rs:164prove_syntactically_eq failedprove_normalize.rs:133rule "symmetric"prove_normalize.rs:146prove_syntactically_eq failedprove_normalize.rs:133rule "existential-nonvar"prove_normalize.rs:170prove_existential_var_eq failedprove_eq.rs:78rule "existential-nonvar"prove_eq.rs:96 (failed: if_let)rule "existential-universal"prove_eq.rs:142 (failed: if_false)
rule "symmetric"prove_normalize.rs:146prove_syntactically_eq failedprove_normalize.rs:133rule "alias"prove_normalize.rs:164prove_syntactically_eq failedprove_normalize.rs:133rule "existential-nonvar"prove_normalize.rs:170prove_existential_var_eq failedprove_eq.rs:78rule "existential-nonvar"prove_eq.rs:96 (failed: if_let)rule "existential-universal"prove_eq.rs:142 (failed: if_false)
rule "normalize-via-impl"prove_normalize.rs:39 (failed: empty_collection)
rule "symmetric"prove_eq.rs:40prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:25rule "normalize-l"prove_eq.rs:71prove_after failedprove_after.rs:8rule "prove_after"prove_after.rs:19prove failedprove_after.rs:19ruleprove_after.rs:19prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:11rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:29prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "assumption - relation"prove_wc.rs:56prove_via failedprove_via.rs:9
rule "eq"prove_wc.rs:127prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:25rule "alias"prove_eq.rs:58prove failedprove_eq.rs:58ruleprove_eq.rs:58prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:11rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:29prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "assumption - relation"prove_wc.rs:56prove_via failedprove_via.rs:9
rule "eq"prove_wc.rs:127prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:25rule "symmetric"prove_eq.rs:40prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:25rule "existential"prove_eq.rs:64prove_existential_var_eq failedprove_eq.rs:78rule "existential-nonvar"prove_eq.rs:96 (failed: if_let)rule "existential-universal"prove_eq.rs:142 (failed: if_false)
rule "normalize-l"prove_eq.rs:70prove_normalize failedprove_normalize.rs:19rule "normalize-via-assumption"prove_normalize.rs:33prove_normalize_via failedprove_normalize.rs:55
rule "normalize-l"prove_eq.rs:71prove_after failedprove_after.rs:8rule "prove_after"prove_after.rs:19prove failedprove_after.rs:19ruleprove_after.rs:19prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:11rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:29prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "assumption - relation"prove_wc.rs:56prove_via failedprove_via.rs:9
rule "eq"prove_wc.rs:127prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:25rule "symmetric"prove_eq.rs:40prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:25rule "normalize-l"prove_eq.rs:70prove_normalize failedprove_normalize.rs:19rule "normalize-via-assumption"prove_normalize.rs:33prove_normalize_via failedprove_normalize.rs:55rule "axiom-l"prove_normalize.rs:96prove_syntactically_eq failedprove_normalize.rs:133rule "alias"prove_normalize.rs:164prove_syntactically_eq failedprove_normalize.rs:133rule "symmetric"prove_normalize.rs:146prove_syntactically_eq failedprove_normalize.rs:133rule "existential-nonvar"prove_normalize.rs:170prove_existential_var_eq failedprove_eq.rs:78rule "existential-nonvar"prove_eq.rs:96 (failed: if_let)rule "existential-universal"prove_eq.rs:142 (failed: if_false)
rule "symmetric"prove_normalize.rs:146prove_syntactically_eq failedprove_normalize.rs:133rule "alias"prove_normalize.rs:164prove_syntactically_eq failedprove_normalize.rs:133rule "existential-nonvar"prove_normalize.rs:170prove_existential_var_eq failedprove_eq.rs:78rule "existential-nonvar"prove_eq.rs:96 (failed: if_let)rule "existential-universal"prove_eq.rs:142 (failed: if_false)
rule "normalize-via-impl"prove_normalize.rs:39 (failed: empty_collection)
rule "symmetric"prove_eq.rs:40prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:25rule "alias"prove_eq.rs:58prove failedprove_eq.rs:58ruleprove_eq.rs:58prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:11rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:29prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "assumption - relation"prove_wc.rs:56prove_via failedprove_via.rs:9
rule "eq"prove_wc.rs:127prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:25rule "existential"prove_eq.rs:64prove_existential_var_eq failedprove_eq.rs:78rule "existential-nonvar"prove_eq.rs:96 (failed: if_let)rule "existential-universal"prove_eq.rs:142 (failed: if_false)
rule "normalize-l"prove_eq.rs:70prove_normalize failedprove_normalize.rs:19rule "normalize-via-assumption"prove_normalize.rs:33prove_normalize_via failedprove_normalize.rs:55
rule "normalize-l"prove_eq.rs:70prove_normalize failedprove_normalize.rs:19rule "normalize-via-assumption"prove_normalize.rs:33prove_normalize_via failedprove_normalize.rs:55rule "axiom-l"prove_normalize.rs:96prove_syntactically_eq failedprove_normalize.rs:133rule "alias"prove_normalize.rs:164prove_syntactically_eq failedprove_normalize.rs:133rule "symmetric"prove_normalize.rs:146prove_syntactically_eq failedprove_normalize.rs:133rule "existential-nonvar"prove_normalize.rs:170prove_existential_var_eq failedprove_eq.rs:78rule "existential-nonvar"prove_eq.rs:96 (failed: if_let)rule "existential-universal"prove_eq.rs:142 (failed: if_false)
rule "symmetric"prove_normalize.rs:146prove_syntactically_eq failedprove_normalize.rs:133rule "alias"prove_normalize.rs:164prove_syntactically_eq failedprove_normalize.rs:133rule "existential-nonvar"prove_normalize.rs:170prove_existential_var_eq failedprove_eq.rs:78rule "existential-nonvar"prove_eq.rs:96 (failed: if_let)rule "existential-universal"prove_eq.rs:142 (failed: if_false)
rule "normalize-via-impl"prove_normalize.rs:39 (failed: empty_collection)
Source location: crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/test/eq_partial_eq.rs:33
#[test]
fn not_partial_eq_implies_eq() {
let goal: Wc = term("for<T> if {PartialEq(T)} Eq(T)");
prove(decls(), (), (), goal)
.assert_err(
expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: Eq(!ty_1), via: PartialEq(!ty_1), assumptions: {PartialEq(!ty_1)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_1], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: Eq(!ty_1), via: PartialEq(?ty_2), assumptions: {PartialEq(!ty_1)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_1, ?ty_2], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
}
Failed proof tree
prove failedeq_partial_eq.rs:32ruleeq_partial_eq.rs:32prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:11rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:29prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "forall"prove_wc.rs:37prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "implies"prove_wc.rs:43prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "assumption - predicate"prove_wc.rs:50prove_via failedprove_via.rs:9
rule "trait implied bound"prove_wc.rs:120prove_via failedprove_via.rs:9
Source location: crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/test/eq_partial_eq.rs:44
#[test]
fn universals_not_eq() {
let goal: Wc = term("for<T, U> if {Eq(T)} PartialEq(U)");
prove(decls(), (), (), goal)
.assert_err(
expect![[r#"
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: PartialEq(!ty_2), via: Eq(!ty_1), assumptions: {Eq(!ty_1)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_1, !ty_2], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: !ty_0 = !ty_1, via: Eq(!ty_0), assumptions: {Eq(!ty_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0, !ty_1], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_normalize.rs:55:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize_via { goal: !ty_0, via: Eq(!ty_0), assumptions: {Eq(!ty_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0, !ty_1], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_normalize.rs:55:1: no applicable rules for prove_normalize_via { goal: !ty_1, via: Eq(!ty_0), assumptions: {Eq(!ty_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0, !ty_1], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }
crates/formality-rust/src/prove/prove/prove/prove_via.rs:9:1: no applicable rules for prove_via { goal: Eq(!ty_1), via: PartialEq(?ty_2), assumptions: {Eq(!ty_0)}, env: Env { variables: [!ty_0, !ty_1, ?ty_2], bias: Soundness, pending: [], allow_pending_outlives: false } }"#]]);
}
Failed proof tree
prove failedeq_partial_eq.rs:43ruleeq_partial_eq.rs:43prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:11rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:29prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "forall"prove_wc.rs:37prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "implies"prove_wc.rs:43prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "assumption - predicate"prove_wc.rs:50prove_via failedprove_via.rs:9
rule "trait implied bound"prove_wc.rs:121prove_after failedprove_after.rs:8rule "prove_after"prove_after.rs:19prove failedprove_after.rs:19ruleprove_after.rs:19prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:11rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:29prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "assumption - predicate"prove_wc.rs:50prove_via failedprove_via.rs:9rule "predicate-congruence-axiom"prove_via.rs:31prove failedprove_via.rs:31ruleprove_via.rs:31prove_wc_list failedprove_wc_list.rs:11rule "some"prove_wc_list.rs:29prove_wc failedprove_wc.rs:23rule "assumption - relation"prove_wc.rs:56prove_via failedprove_via.rs:9
rule "eq"prove_wc.rs:127prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:25rule "normalize-l"prove_eq.rs:70prove_normalize failedprove_normalize.rs:19rule "normalize-via-assumption"prove_normalize.rs:33prove_normalize_via failedprove_normalize.rs:55
rule "symmetric"prove_eq.rs:40prove_eq failedprove_eq.rs:25rule "normalize-l"prove_eq.rs:70prove_normalize failedprove_normalize.rs:19rule "normalize-via-assumption"prove_normalize.rs:33prove_normalize_via failedprove_normalize.rs:55
rule "trait implied bound"prove_wc.rs:120prove_via failedprove_via.rs:9