Futures and the Async Syntax
The key elements of asynchronous programming in Rust are futures and Rust’s
async
and await
keywords.
A future is a value which may not be ready now, but will become ready at some
point in the future. (This same concept shows up in many languages, sometimes
under other names such as “task” or “promise”.) Rust provides a Future
trait
as a building block so different async operations can be implemented with
different data structures, but with a common interface. In Rust, we say that
types which implement the Future
trait are futures. Each type which
implements Future
holds its own information about the progress that has been
made and what “ready” means.
The async
keyword can be applied to blocks and functions to specify that they
can be interrupted and resumed. Within an async block or async function, you can
use the await
keyword to wait for a future to become ready, called awaiting a
future. Each place you await a future within an async block or function is a
place that async block or function may get paused and resumed. The process of
checking with a future to see if its value is available yet is called polling.
Some other languages also use async
and await
keywords for async
programming. If you’re familiar with those languages, you may notice some
significant differences in how Rust does things, including how it handles the
syntax. That’s for good reason, as we’ll see!
Most of the time when writing async Rust, we use the async
and await
keywords. Rust compiles them into equivalent code using the Future
trait, much
as it compiles for
loops into equivalent code using the Iterator
trait.
Because Rust provides the Future
trait, though, you can also implement it for
your own data types when you need to. Many of the functions we’ll see
throughout this chapter return types with their own implementations of Future
.
We’ll return to the definition of the trait at the end of the chapter and dig
into more of how it works, but this is enough detail to keep us moving forward.
That may all feel a bit abstract. Let’s write our first async program: a little web scraper. We’ll pass in two URLs from the command line, fetch both of them concurrently, and return the result of whichever one finishes first. This example will have a fair bit of new syntax, but don’t worry. We’ll explain everything you need to know as we go.
Our First Async Program
To keep this chapter focused on learning async, rather than juggling parts of
the ecosystem, we have created the trpl
crate (trpl
is short for “The Rust
Programming Language”). It re-exports all the types, traits, and functions
you’ll need, primarily from the futures
and tokio
crates.
-
The
futures
crate is an official home for Rust experimentation for async code, and is actually where theFuture
type was originally designed. -
Tokio is the most widely used async runtime in Rust today, especially (but not only!) for web applications. There are other great runtimes out there, and they may be more suitable for your purposes. We use Tokio under the hood for
trpl
because it’s well-tested and widely used.
In some cases, trpl
also renames or wraps the original APIs to let us stay
focused on the details relevant to this chapter. If you want to understand what
the crate does, we encourage you to check out its source code.
You’ll be able to see what crate each re-export comes from, and we’ve left
extensive comments explaining what the crate does.
Create a new binary project named hello-async
and add the trpl
crate as a
dependency:
$ cargo new hello-async
$ cd hello-async
$ cargo add trpl
Now we can use the various pieces provided by trpl
to write our first async
program. We’ll build a little command line tool which fetches two web pages,
pulls the <title>
element from each, and prints out the title of whichever
finishes that whole process first.
Let’s start by writing a function that takes one page URL as a parameter, makes a request to it, and returns the text of the title element:
In Listing 17-1, we define a function named page_title
, and we mark it with
the async
keyword. Then we use the trpl::get
function to fetch whatever URL
is passed in, and, and we await the response by using the await
keyword. Then
we get the text of the response by calling its text
method and once again
awaiting it with the await
keyword. Both of these steps are asynchronous. For
get
, we need to wait for the server to send back the first part of its
response, which will include HTTP headers, cookies, and so on. That part of the
response can be delivered separately from the body of the request. Especially if
the body is very large, it can take some time for it all to arrive. Thus, we
have to wait for the entirety of the response to arrive, so the text
method
is also async.
We have to explicitly await both of these futures, because futures in Rust are
lazy: they don’t do anything until you ask them to with await
. (In fact,
Rust will show a compiler warning if you don’t use a future.) This should
remind you of our discussion of iterators back in Chapter 13.
Iterators do nothing unless you call their next
method—whether directly, or
using for
loops or methods such as map
which use next
under the hood. With
futures, the same basic idea applies: they do nothing unless you explicitly ask
them to. This laziness allows Rust to avoid running async code until it’s
actually needed.
Note: This is different from the behavior we saw when using thread::spawn
in
the previous chapter, where the closure we passed to another thread started
running immediately. It’s also different from how many other languages
approach async! But it’s important for Rust. We’ll see why that is later.
Once we have response_text
, we can then parse it into an instance of the
Html
type using Html::parse
. Instead of a raw string, we now have a data
type we can use to work with the HTML as a richer data structure. In particular,
we can use the select_first
method to find the first instance of a given CSS
selector. By passing the string "title"
, we’ll get the first <title>
element in the document, if there is one. Because there may not be any matching
element, select_first
returns an Option<ElementRef>
. Finally, we use the
Option::map
method, which lets us work with the item in the Option
if it’s
present, and do nothing if it isn’t. (We could also use a match
expression
here, but map
is more idiomatic.) In the body of the function we supply to
map
, we call inner_html
on the title_element
to get its content, which is
a String
. When all is said and done, we have an Option<String>
.
Notice that Rust’s await
keyword goes after the expression you’re awaiting,
not before it. That is, it’s a postfix keyword. This may be different from
what you might be used to if you have used async in other languages. Rust chose
this because it makes chains of methods much nicer to work with. As a result, we
can change the body of page_url_for
to chain the trpl::get
and text
function calls together with await
between them, as shown in Listing 17-2:
With that, we have successfully written our first async function! Before we add
some code in main
to call it, let’s talk a little more about what we’ve
written and what it means.
When Rust sees a block marked with the async
keyword, it compiles it into a
unique, anonymous data type which implements the Future
trait. When Rust sees
a function marked with async
, it compiles it into a non-async function whose
body is an async block. An async function’s return type is the type of the
anonymous data type the compiler creates for that async block.
Thus, writing async fn
is equivalent to writing a function which returns a
future of the return type. When the compiler sees a function definition such
as the async fn page_title
in Listing 17-1, it’s equivalent to a non-async
function defined like this:
#![allow(unused)] fn main() { extern crate trpl; // required for mdbook test use std::future::Future; use trpl::Html; fn page_title(url: &str) -> impl Future<Output = Option<String>> + '_ { async move { let text = trpl::get(url).await.text().await; Html::parse(&text) .select_first("title") .map(|title| title.inner_html()) } } }
Let’s walk through each part of the transformed version:
- It uses the
impl Trait
syntax we discussed back in the “Traits as Parameters” section in Chapter 10. - The returned trait is a
Future
, with an associated type ofOutput
. Notice that theOutput
type isOption<String>
, which is the same as the the original return type from theasync fn
version ofpage_title
. - All of the code called in the body of the original function is wrapped in an
async move
block. Remember that blocks are expressions. This whole block is the expression returned from the function. - This async block produces a value with the type
Option<String>
, as described above. That value matches theOutput
type in the return type. This is just like other blocks you have seen. - The new function body is an
async move
block because of how it uses theurl
parameter. (We’ll talk aboutasync
vs.async move
much more later in the chapter.) - The new version of the function has a kind of lifetime we haven’t seen before
in the output type:
'_
. Because the function returns aFuture
which refers to a reference—in this case, the reference from theurl
parameter—we need to tell Rust that we mean for that reference to be included. We don’t have to name the lifetime here, because Rust is smart enough to know there is only one reference which could be involved, but we do have to be explicit that the resultingFuture
is bound by that lifetime.
Now we can call page_title
in main
. To start, we’ll just get the title
for a single page. In Listing 17-3, we follow the same pattern we used for
getting command line arguments back in Chapter 12. Then we pass the first URL
page_title
, and await the result. Because the value produced by the future is
an Option<String>
, we use a match
expression to print different messages to
account for whether the page had a <title>
.
Unfortunately, this doesn’t compile. The only place we can use the await
keyword is in async functions or blocks, and Rust won’t let us mark the
special main
function as async
.
error[E0752]: `main` function is not allowed to be `async`
--> src/main.rs:6:1
|
6 | async fn main() {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ `main` function is not allowed to be `async`
The reason main
can’t be marked async
is that async code needs a runtime:
a Rust crate which manages the details of executing asynchronous code. A
program’s main
function can initialize a runtime, but it’s not a runtime
itself. (We’ll see more about why this is a bit later.) Every Rust program
that executes async code has at least one place where it sets up a runtime and
executes the futures.
Most languages which support async bundle a runtime with the language. Rust does not. Instead, there are many different async runtimes available, each of which makes different tradeoffs suitable to the use case they target. For example, a high-throughput web server with many CPU cores and a large amount of RAM has very different needs than a microcontroller with a single core, a small amount of RAM, and no ability to do heap allocations. The crates which provide those runtimes also often supply async versions of common functionality such as file or network I/O.
Here, and throughout the rest of this chapter, we’ll use the run
function
from the trpl
crate, which takes a future as an argument and runs it to
completion. Behind the scenes, calling run
sets up a runtime to use to run the
future passed in. Once the future completes, run
returns whatever value the
future produced.
We could pass the future returned by page_title
directly to run
. Once it
completed, we would be able to match on the resulting Option<String>
, the way
we tried to do in Listing 17-3. However, for most of the examples in the chapter
(and most async code in the real world!), we’ll be doing more than just one
async function call, so instead we’ll pass an async
block and explicitly
await the result of calling page_title
, as in Listing 17-4.
When we run this, we get the behavior we might have expected initially:
$ cargo run "http://www.rust-lang.org"
The title for http://www.rust-lang.org was
Rust Programming Language
Phew: we finally have some working async code! This now compiles, and we can run it. Before we add code to race two sites against each other, let’s briefly turn our attention back to how futures work.
Each await point—that is, every place where the code uses the await
keyword—represents a place where control gets handed back to the runtime. To
make that work, Rust needs to keep track of the state involved in the async
block, so that the runtime can kick off some other work and then come back when
it’s ready to try advancing this one again. This is an invisible state machine,
as if you wrote an enum in this way to save the current state at each await
point:
#![allow(unused)] fn main() { extern crate trpl; // required for mdbook test enum PageTitleFuture<'a> { Initial { url: &'a str }, GetAwaitPoint { url: &'a str }, TextAwaitPoint { response: trpl::Response }, } }
Writing the code to transition between each state by hand would be tedious and error-prone, especially when adding more functionality and more states to the code later. Instead, the Rust compiler creates and manages the state machine data structures for async code automatically. If you’re wondering: yep, the normal borrowing and ownership rules around data structures all apply. Happily, the compiler also handles checking those for us, and has good error messages. We’ll work through a few of those later in the chapter!
Ultimately, something has to execute that state machine. That something is a runtime. (This is why you may sometimes come across references to executors when looking into runtimes: an executor is the part of a runtime responsible for executing the async code.)
Now we can understand why the compiler stopped us from making main
itself an
async function back in Listing 17-3. If main
were an async function, something
else would need to manage the state machine for whatever future main
returned,
but main
is the starting point for the program! Instead, we call the
trpl::run
function in main
, which sets up a runtime and runs the future
returned by the async
block until it returns Ready
.
Note: some runtimes provide macros to make it so you can write an async main
function. Those macros rewrite async fn main() { ... }
to be a normal fn main
which does the same thing we did by hand in Listing 17-5: call a
function which runs a future to completion the way trpl::run
does.
Let’s put these pieces together and see how we can write concurrent code, by
calling page_title
with two different URLs passed in from the command line
and racing them.
In Listing 17-5, we begin by calling page_title
for each of the user-supplied
URLs. We save the futures produced by calling page_title
as title_fut_1
and
title_fut_2
. Remember, these don’t do anything yet, because futures are lazy,
and we haven’t yet awaited them. Then we pass the futures to trpl::race
,
which returns a value to indicate which of the futures passed to it finishes
first.
Note: Under the hood, race
is built on a more general function, select
,
which you will encounter more often in real-world Rust code. A select
function can do a lot of things that trpl::race
function can’t, but it also
has some additional complexity that we can skip over for now.
Either future can legitimately “win,” so it doesn’t make sense to return a
Result
. Instead, race
returns a type we haven’t seen before,
trpl::Either
. The Either
type is somewhat similar to a Result
, in that it
has two cases. Unlike Result
, though, there is no notion of success or
failure baked into Either
. Instead, it uses Left
and Right
to indicate
“one or the other”.
#![allow(unused)] fn main() { enum Either<A, B> { Left(A), Right(B), } }
The race
function returns Left
if the first argument finishes first, with
that future’s output, and Right
with the second future argument’s output if
that one finishes first. This matches the order the arguments appear when
calling the function: the first argument is to the left of the second argument.
We also update page_title
to return the same URL passed in. That way, if
the page which returns first does not have a <title>
we can resolve, we can
still print a meaningful message. With that information available, we wrap up by
updating our println!
output to indicate both which URL finished first and
what the <title>
was for the web page at that URL, if any.
You have built a small working web scraper now! Pick a couple URLs and run the command line tool. You may discover that some sites are reliably faster than others, while in other cases which site “wins” varies from run to run. More importantly, you’ve learned the basics of working with futures, so we can now dig into even more of the things we can do with async.